Psychopathe Jihadiste<\/p>\n
\nComme tout psychopathe, le psychopathe jihadiste cherche \u00e0 d\u00e9truire et \u00e0 conqu\u00e9rir. Alors qu\u2019il suit les mandats de sa religion, il est spirituellement vide \u00e0 l\u2019int\u00e9rieur. Il doit donc voler la force vitale des non-musulmans dont il est victime, afin de pouvoir subvenir temporairement \u00e0 ses besoins.<\/p>\n
Sa strat\u00e9gie est impitoyable et rus\u00e9e. Il charme, trompe et manipule \u2013 et lorsqu\u2019il estime que le moment est venu, il pi\u00e8ge ses victimes non musulmanes et les d\u00e9vore. Pour d\u00e9montrer comment le psychopathe jihadiste r\u00e9ussit aujourd\u2019hui dans sa qu\u00eate malveillante, nous allons maintenant entrer et d\u00e9voiler son monde morbide. Nous encourageons nos lecteurs \u00e0 garder le chapitre pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent \u00e0 port\u00e9e de main et \u00e0 garder ses th\u00e8mes cl\u00e9s \u00e0 l’esprit, car \u00e0 mesure que nous d\u00e9crivons les principales caract\u00e9ristiques du psychopathe jihadiste et sa strat\u00e9gie de conqu\u00eate, il deviendra clair, \u00e9l\u00e9ment par \u00e9l\u00e9ment, \u00e0 quel point son programme est une image miroir du monde du psychopathe traditionnel, avec seulement une touche jihadiste.<\/p>\n
Dans sa qu\u00eate pour soumettre les non-musulmans, le psychopathe jihadiste dispose de son arme \u00e9vidente, le jihad violent, mais il dispose \u00e9galement d\u2019une arme tout aussi puissante, sinon plus, dans son arsenal : le stratag\u00e8me de la tromperie. Il est vital pour nous de commencer notre histoire en examinant cette tactique, car elle constitue le fondement essentiel de la guerre des psychopathes jihadistes.
\nNotre \u00e9tude de la supercherie du psychopathe jihadiste commence par le fait que l\u2019Islam est, \u00e0 la base, une religion\/id\u00e9ologie enracin\u00e9e dans la tromperie. Le Dieu de l\u2019Islam, qui s\u2019appelle Allah, se pr\u00e9sente fi\u00e8rement \u00e0 plusieurs reprises dans le Coran comme le plus grand trompeur.[1] Si Allah est le p\u00e8re du mensonge, on comprend pourquoi l\u2019Islam enseigne que le mensonge est une obligation pour les musulmans s\u2019il sert le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de l\u2019Islam.<\/p>\n
Les autorit\u00e9s islamiques ont m\u00eame cr\u00e9\u00e9 de v\u00e9ritables doctrines religieuses qui imposent et justifient le mensonge. L’une de ces doctrines est connue sous le nom de taqiyya, un principe qui permet aux musulmans de mentir aux non-musulmans dans le but de les soumettre et de renforcer l’Islam.[2] Les musulmans sont \u00e9galement encourag\u00e9s \u00e0 rompre leur serment si cela fait avancer la cause du supr\u00e9macisme islamique.[3] Le proph\u00e8te de l’Islam, Mahomet, consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme le mod\u00e8le id\u00e9al \u00e0 suivre par tous les musulmans,[4] a montr\u00e9 le parfait exemple dans ce domaine, rompant de nombreux serments et trait\u00e9s, y compris ceux qu’il avait conclus avec les tribus juives connues sous le nom de \u00ab Banu Qaynuqa \u00bb et les \u00ab Quraysh \u00bb. Mahomet a viol\u00e9 le trait\u00e9 de Hudaybiyya avec les Quraysh, par exemple, en refusant de renvoyer une femme de la tribu, Umm-Kulthum, \u00e0 La Mecque. Allah et Mahomet ont tous deux pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 des exemples de tromperie que leurs disciples peuvent imiter. Et tandis qu\u2019ils ordonnaient aux musulmans de tromper les non-musulmans, ils trompaient \u00e9galement leurs compatriotes musulmans eux-m\u00eames. En effet, le paradis islamique promis aux musulmans, s\u2019ils meurent en menant une guerre sainte contre des non-musulmans, est en soi un plan trompeur fabriqu\u00e9 par Mahomet, au nom d\u2019Allah, dans le but d\u2019attirer les musulmans dans le jihad.[5]<\/p>\n
L\u2019Islam impose le jihad comme un devoir obligatoire pour tous les musulmans et, malgr\u00e9 la taqiyya des supr\u00e9macistes islamiques sur ce qu\u2019est r\u00e9ellement le jihad[6], il est cens\u00e9 \u00eatre violent. Dans les textes islamiques, le jihad est clairement d\u00e9fini comme \u00ab une guerre contre les non-musulmans pour \u00e9tablir la religion \u00bb.[7] En cons\u00e9quence, les musulmans sont tromp\u00e9s et forc\u00e9s de combattre, de mener le jihad. Et non seulement ils doivent tuer et mourir pour Allah, mais il est tr\u00e8s probl\u00e9matique pour eux d\u2019essayer d\u2019\u00e9chapper \u00e0 ce sort, puisque Mahomet a ordonn\u00e9 de tuer tout musulman qui quitte la religion.[8] Ce que nous avons ici est une structure dans laquelle les musulmans ont pour instruction de tromper les non-musulmans pendant qu\u2019eux-m\u00eames sont tromp\u00e9s.<\/p>\n
Pour aggraver la pathologie de ce paradigme, il est \u00e9galement ordonn\u00e9 aux musulmans de prendre le contr\u00f4le des non-musulmans et de leur faire honte, tandis qu’Allah contr\u00f4le et fait honte aux musulmans eux-m\u00eames dans le processus.[9] En effet, Allah menace et humilie constamment non seulement ses ennemis, mais aussi ses disciples.[10] Apr\u00e8s tout, la loi islamique comporte des r\u00e8gles religieuses extr\u00eamement rigides, qui incluent l\u2019obligation de prier et de je\u00fbner, que chacun doit respecter.
\nLes musulmans sont responsables les uns envers les autres dans ce contexte, et une atmosph\u00e8re perp\u00e9tuelle d\u2019effroi et de terreur plane autour du respect obligatoire de ces r\u00e8gles. Dans les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s r\u00e9gies par la charia, par exemple, un musulman peut facilement \u00eatre condamn\u00e9 \u00e0 mort s’il est surpris en train de ne pas je\u00fbner correctement pendant le Ramadan.[11] Ce que nous avons fondamentalement dans ce paradigme, comme le souligne l\u2019\u00e9crivain Daniel Greenfield, \u00ab est une hi\u00e9rarchie de tromperie et d\u2019oppression dans laquelle les musulmans sont avant tout des esclaves d\u2019Allah. \u00bb pression pour se contr\u00f4ler les uns les autres, alors que leur devoir principal est de mener la guerre sainte. Le r\u00e9sultat final est que la charia est impos\u00e9e \u00e0 tout le monde (qui n\u2019est pas assassin\u00e9) et qu\u2019il ne reste aucune individualit\u00e9 ni libert\u00e9.[13] Une petite faille est parfois laiss\u00e9e aux non-musulmans qui refusent de se convertir mais acceptent de vivre comme des \u00ab dhimmis \u00bb de seconde zone, payant des imp\u00f4ts et se conformant \u00e0 des r\u00e8gles tr\u00e8s strictes.[14]<\/p>\n
Ainsi, nous commen\u00e7ons \u00e0 \u00e9valuer \u00e0 quel point le but supr\u00eame des humains dans l\u2019Islam est de sacrifier leur vie pour Allah \u2013 alors qu\u2019\u00e0 l\u2019inverse, dans le christianisme, Dieu sacrifie Son fils unique, J\u00e9sus, pour les humains.[15] L\u2019\u00e9rudition de l\u2019auteur Nonie Darwish sur ce contraste frappant entre l\u2019Allah de l\u2019Islam et le Dieu de la Bible \u00e9claire puissamment l\u2019esclavage physique et mental dans lequel les adeptes de l\u2019Islam se retrouvent pi\u00e9g\u00e9s. Comme le documente Darwish, la foi islamique ne conf\u00e8re absolument aucune valeur intrins\u00e8que aux musulmans. Autrement dit, les musulmans n\u2019ont aucune \u00ab relation \u00bb avec Allah, ni aucune sorte de conversation \u00e0 double sens avec Lui. Ils ne sont pas invit\u00e9s \u00e0 s\u2019approcher d\u2019Allah pour discuter ou confesser ce qu\u2019il y a dans leur c\u0153ur et leur esprit. Ils n\u2019ont droit \u00e0 aucune libert\u00e9 de conscience, ni \u00e0 l\u2019usage de leur propre raison. Dans cette rue \u00e0 sens unique, un Allah m\u00e9chant, col\u00e9rique et sadique dit simplement aux musulmans quoi faire et quoi ne pas faire. L\u2019ob\u00e9issance inconditionnelle \u00e0 Allah, sous peine de mort et de feu de l\u2019enfer, est donc le message central de l\u2019Islam. Dans la Bible, en revanche, Dieu est un p\u00e8re aimant avec lequel un individu peut entretenir une relation et une conversation personnelle \u2013 et \u00e0 travers lequel il peut trouver le salut.[16]<\/p>\n
Il est crucial que nous assimilions ces faits dans notre \u00e9tude du psychopathe jihadiste, car ils expliquent comment et pourquoi les jihadistes sont comme des robots d\u00e9pourvus de toute qualit\u00e9 humaine ou civilis\u00e9e, y compris la conscience. Le Jihad est leur mission principale et, comme le r\u00e9v\u00e8le Darwish, le jihad \u00ab est l\u2019outil ultime pour contr\u00f4ler les autres. \u00bb[17] L\u2019objectif islamique tout entier est donc le contr\u00f4le. Greenfield propose \u00e9galement une r\u00e9flexion profonde sur ce ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne : L\u2019Islam est fondamentalement une question de pouvoir et non de vie int\u00e9rieure. C\u2019est une relation collective plut\u00f4t que personnelle. Le pouvoir valide les musulmans. Puisque l\u2019Islam est spirituellement vide, la seule validation est le pouvoir et le pouvoir est une validation creuse et insatisfaisante. La v\u00e9rit\u00e9 de l’Islam est d\u00e9montr\u00e9e \u00e0 travers l’oppression musulmane des non-musulmans.[18]<\/p>\n
Alors que le psychopathe jihadiste poursuit son objectif de conqu\u00e9rir ses victimes par la tromperie, la violence et le contr\u00f4le, il fait \u00e9galement constamment honte et bl\u00e2me ses victimes, afin d’\u00e9tablir son contr\u00f4le. La philosophie du psychopathe jihadiste est claire : ses victimes sont mauvaises et lui est bon. Cette mentalit\u00e9 jihadiste \u00e9mane directement des enseignements d\u2019Allah et de Mahomet selon lesquels tous les non-musulmans sont des p\u00e9cheurs, alors que les musulmans ne le sont pas. En Islam, m\u00eame si les musulmans peuvent p\u00e9cher, cela n\u2019a pas d\u2019importance, du moment qu\u2019ils compensent leurs transgressions en menant le jihad. Cette r\u00e9alit\u00e9 sert de terreau fertile au monopole des jihadistes sur la victimisation, qui, \u00e0 son tour, sert de porte d\u2019entr\u00e9e cl\u00e9 sur le chemin de la conqu\u00eate du psychopathe jihadiste.
\nExaminons maintenant de plus pr\u00e8s cette dynamique : Dans l\u2019Islam, les non-musulmans sont consid\u00e9r\u00e9s comme des transgresseurs mauvais et pervers. Mahomet a rendu ce message tr\u00e8s clair en menant une guerre contre les incroyants et en condamnant sans rel\u00e2che les chr\u00e9tiens et les juifs pour avoir rejet\u00e9 Allah.[19] Comme le note Darwish : L\u2019Islam est la seule religion qui consacre la majorit\u00e9 de ses \u00e9critures non pas \u00e0 ses propres adepte, mais \u00e0 condamner des groupes entiers de personnes ext\u00e9rieures \u00e0 la religion comme des p\u00e9cheurs maudits, condamn\u00e9s et impardonnables.[20] Certes, l\u2019Islam d\u00e9finit les incroyants comme les pires des gens, les coupables. Mohammed, quant \u00e0 lui, comme indiqu\u00e9 ci-dessus, est consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme un mod\u00e8le de comportement exemplaire, et ses disciples sont intrins\u00e8quement innocents. L\u2019Islam se consid\u00e8re comme parfait et consid\u00e8re les musulmans comme \u00ab le meilleur des gens \u00bb qui ne se trompent jamais en pers\u00e9cutant les non-musulmans.[21] De plus, contrairement aux juifs et aux chr\u00e9tiens de la Bible, \u00e0 qui la confession apporte le pardon, la gr\u00e2ce et la r\u00e9demption, confesser ses p\u00e9ch\u00e9s dans l\u2019Islam n\u2019est pas une b\u00e9n\u00e9diction. C’est parce que, encore une fois, les musulmans ne sont pas consid\u00e9r\u00e9s comme des p\u00e9cheurs dans la th\u00e9ologie islamique, et s’ils p\u00e8chent, ils ne doivent pas confesser leurs p\u00e9ch\u00e9s, mais les cacher.[22] Pour les musulmans coupables d\u2019actes r\u00e9pr\u00e9hensibles, il n\u2019y a qu\u2019une seule mani\u00e8re d\u2019obtenir le pardon : faire la guerre aux non-musulmans dans le cadre du jihad.[23] Ainsi, puisque la plupart des musulmans sont conscients, dans leur propre conscience, qu\u2019ils sont, \u00e0 divers \u00e9gards, des p\u00e9cheurs, ils savent ce qu\u2019ils doivent faire pour y rem\u00e9dier. Par cons\u00e9quent, le jihad consiste en fin de compte \u00e0 se purifier non seulement avec le sang des autres, mais aussi avec son propre sang.[24]
\nLe militant alg\u00e9rien Ali Benhadj a cristallis\u00e9 ce principe central de l\u2019Islam selon lequel la mort et le sang purifient la terre : Si la foi, une croyance, n\u2019est pas arros\u00e9e et irrigu\u00e9e par le sang, elle ne grandit pas. Cela ne vit pas. Les principes sont renforc\u00e9s par les sacrifices, les op\u00e9rations suicides et le martyre pour Allah. La foi se propage en comptant chaque jour les morts, en additionnant les massacres et les charniers. Peu importe que la personne sacrifi\u00e9e ne soit plus l\u00e0. Il a gagn\u00e9.[25]<\/p>\n
La r\u00e9alit\u00e9 qui \u00e9merge de ce paradigme pathologique est que l\u2019on apprend essentiellement aux musulmans \u00e0 provoquer la mort des incroyants et d\u2019eux-m\u00eames par la guerre sainte. Et il leur est demand\u00e9 de changer les autres, pas eux-m\u00eames. Ainsi, quand quelque chose ne va pas, cela ne peut pas \u00eatre la faute d\u2019une doctrine parfaite appliqu\u00e9e par les meilleurs des gens, cela doit \u00eatre la faute des non-musulmans. Lorsque le jihad est men\u00e9 contre des non-musulmans, c’est de leur faute, car ils ont provoqu\u00e9 la guerre contre eux-m\u00eames en \u00e9tant p\u00e9cheurs et en rejetant Allah.[26] Les non-musulmans sont toujours bl\u00e2m\u00e9s et les musulmans ne doivent jamais en assumer la responsabilit\u00e9.<\/p>\n
La th\u00e9ologie islamique fournit une autre raison pour laquelle les musulmans ne doivent jamais \u00eatre tenus responsables de quoi que ce soit en relation avec les non-musulmans : l\u2019incr\u00e9dulit\u00e9 des incroyants est consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme pire que le meurtre. Autrement dit, la r\u00e9bellion des non-musulmans contre Allah est consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme une transgression plus grande que m\u00eame un acte de meurtre commis contre eux.[27] L’existence m\u00eame de non-musulmans est consid\u00e9r\u00e9e par l’Islam comme offensante et comme une provocation \u00e0 une violence justifiable.[28] Ainsi, l\u2019Islam est, par nature, une victime. Comme l\u2019a document\u00e9 l\u2019ancien \u00e9crivain musulman Abu Kasem, la th\u00e9ologie islamique inspire l\u2019id\u00e9e que l\u2019Islam lui-m\u00eame est offens\u00e9 et pers\u00e9cut\u00e9 par toute activit\u00e9 non islamique men\u00e9e par des incroyants, n\u2019importe o\u00f9 et \u00e0 tout moment. Il donne de nombreux exemples, depuis une femme incroyante s’aventurant dehors sans hijab jusqu’\u00e0 des incroyants buvant de l’alcool ou allant au th\u00e9\u00e2tre. Quiconque fait quelque chose, n’importe o\u00f9, qui va \u00e0 l’encontre de la volont\u00e9 d’Allah, repr\u00e9sente un affront \u00e0 l’Islam. Par cons\u00e9quent, l\u2019Islam se consid\u00e8re comme la seule religion \u00e0 laquelle toute personne sur terre doit se soumettre, et le refus de se soumettre est consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme un acte de d\u00e9fi envers l\u2019Islam.[29] Et si le psychopathe jihadiste nous convainc qu\u2019il est la v\u00e9ritable victime, il doit aussi se convaincre lui-m\u00eame. Comme l\u2019explique l\u2019ex-musulman iranien Ali Sina : L’Islam est la religion de la victimisation permanente. La victimisation justifie la vengeance.
\nSi vous \u00eates musulman, le jihad vous est prescrit contre ceux qui vous oppriment. Cette oppression n\u2019a pas besoin d\u2019\u00eatre r\u00e9elle. Cela peut \u00eatre aussi imaginaire que de percevoir une insulte \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de votre croyance. Critiquer l’Islam est par cons\u00e9quent per\u00e7u comme une oppression et les musulmans se sentent donc oblig\u00e9s et justifi\u00e9s de se venger.[30] Pendant tout le temps o\u00f9 les jihadistes oppriment les incroyants, ils croient donc que ce sont eux qui sont opprim\u00e9s. Et les jihadistes qui adoptent ce comportement ne peuvent pas p\u00e9cher, puisque, encore une fois, il n\u2019y a pas de p\u00e9ch\u00e9 dans l\u2019Islam et il n\u2019est pas n\u00e9cessaire que les musulmans se repentent de leurs actes. Ainsi, nous trouvons le Coran autorisant les opprim\u00e9s \u00e0 lutter contre leurs oppresseurs[31], et la justification islamique du jihad pour \u00e9liminer l\u2019incr\u00e9dulit\u00e9.[32]
\n\u00c0 ce stade, nous sommes en mesure de d\u00e9crypter de nombreux traits psychopathiques qui font surface dans le monde du jihad, notamment celui-ci, fondamental : ne jamais avoir \u00e0 dire qu\u2019on est d\u00e9sol\u00e9. Le psychopathe jihadiste ne s\u2019excuse jamais. Sans surprise, Mahomet a \u00e9galement montr\u00e9 l\u2019exemple \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard. En effet, lorsque le Messager d\u2019Allah blessait des innocents, il ne s\u2019excusait jamais et d\u00e9crivait toujours ses victimes comme m\u00e9ritant leur punition. Lorsqu\u2019il a commis des crimes de guerre, la th\u00e9ologie islamique le consid\u00e8re comme innocent. Lorsqu’il fit d\u00e9capiter six \u00e0 neuf cents hommes juifs de la tribu Banu Qurayza, ils avaient, dans la vision islamique, demand\u00e9 ce sort en refusant de se convertir \u00e0 l’islam.[33] Ainsi, un \u00e9l\u00e9ment essentiel du manuel de jeu du psychopathe jihadiste se cristallise sous nos yeux : la mascarade du \u00ab Je suis une victime \u00bb. En effet, tout en poussant l\u2019id\u00e9e que la victime a provoqu\u00e9 une agression islamique contre elle, le psychopathe jihadiste se pr\u00e9sente perp\u00e9tuellement comme la partie \u00e0 qui l\u2019on fait du tort. Et oui, encore une fois, Mahomet a montr\u00e9 l\u2019exemple ici aussi, puisqu\u2019il a jou\u00e9 le r\u00f4le de victime \u00e0 chaque \u00e9tape de sa guerre contre les incroyants. Au d\u00e9but de sa mission, par exemple, lorsque Mahomet et ses disciples ne constituaient qu’un petit groupe \u00e0 La Mecque et que leurs chances de vaincre les incroyants \u00e9taient nulles, le messager d’Allah se pr\u00e9sentait comme une minorit\u00e9 pers\u00e9cut\u00e9e et victimis\u00e9e dont le message \u00e9tait un message de paix et de tol\u00e9rance (c’est-\u00e0-dire le Coran 109 : 1-6 : \u00ab Vous aurez votre religion et j’aurai ma religion \u00bb), tout en proclamant \u00e9galement une vengeance future contre ses pers\u00e9cuteurs non musulmans.[34] Cela a \u00e9tabli une r\u00e8gle de base pour tous les musulmans : lorsque vous \u00eates en minorit\u00e9 dans un pays ou une population, soyez trompeur en pr\u00eachant un message de tol\u00e9rance et en promouvant votre propre statut de victime en tant que minorit\u00e9 opprim\u00e9e ; Lorsque vous finirez par grandir en nombre et devenir puissant, prenez l’\u00e9p\u00e9e, comme l’ont fait Mahomet et ses disciples lorsqu’ils ont grandi en nombre et ont acquis du pouvoir.[35]<\/p>\n
Une fois que Mahomet fut devenu plus fort et fut capable de soumettre les incroyants, le jihad entra dans une phase violente, et ainsi Mahomet mena une guerre sainte impitoyable, qui comprenait l’ordre d’assassinats politiques. Mais m\u00eame lorsque Mahomet s\u2019est livr\u00e9 \u00e0 cette terreur, il s\u2019est toujours positionn\u00e9 comme une victime. Apr\u00e8s tout, les tribus juives contre lesquelles il a perp\u00e9tr\u00e9 le jihad refusaient toujours de se convertir \u00e0 l\u2019islam, et un tel refus \u00e9tait consid\u00e9r\u00e9 par Mahomet comme un acte d\u2019oppression contre lui et ses partisans \u2013 et comme une violence contre Allah.[36] C\u2019est pourquoi les commentateurs islamiques de la brutalit\u00e9 de Mahomet contre les Juifs soulignent toujours le caract\u00e8re de victime des musulmans et la trahison des Juifs.[37] L’auteur Mark Durie note comment Mahomet a jou\u00e9 la carte de la victime : L\u2019un des th\u00e8mes du programme de Mohammed \u00e9tait l\u2019accent mis sur le statut de victime des musulmans. Pour soutenir la position th\u00e9ologique selon laquelle la conqu\u00eate est une lib\u00e9ration, il devient n\u00e9cessaire de chercher des raisons de d\u00e9clarer l\u2019ennemi infid\u00e8le coupable et m\u00e9ritant d\u2019\u00eatre attaqu\u00e9. En outre, plus la punition est extr\u00eame, plus il devient n\u00e9cessaire d\u2019insister sur la culpabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019ennemi. Puisque, par d\u00e9cret divin, les souffrances des musulmans \u00e9taient \u00ab pires que le massacre \u00bb, il est devenu obligatoire pour les musulmans de consid\u00e9rer leur statut de victime comme plus grand que tout ce qu\u2019ils ont inflig\u00e9 \u00e0 leurs ennemis. Une plus grande victimisation des musulmans est devenue une n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 doctrinale, un \u00e9l\u00e9ment de la \u00ab boussole de la foi \u00bb pour les musulmans.[38] En cons\u00e9quence, m\u00eame lorsque Mahomet ordonnait \u00e0 ses disciples de tuer diverses personnes, il \u00e9tait toujours la victime, affirmant que les personnes qu’il avait assassin\u00e9es l’avaient non seulement bless\u00e9 personnellement, mais avaient \u00e9galement bless\u00e9 Allah. Le sort terrible de la po\u00e9tesse Asma bint Marwan est typique \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard. Lorsqu\u2019elle \u00e9crivit des vers critiquant le meurtre par Mahomet d\u2019un autre po\u00e8te, Abu \u2019Afak (qui avait cent ans), Mahomet cria sur la douleur qu\u2019elle lui causait, demandant : \u00ab Personne ne me d\u00e9barrassera-t-il de cette fille de Marwan ? L\u2019un des disciples de Mahomet, Umayr ibn Adi, s\u2019est imm\u00e9diatement rendu chez Marwan la m\u00eame nuit, o\u00f9 il l\u2019a assassin\u00e9e ainsi que son b\u00e9b\u00e9 alors qu\u2019elle allaitait l\u2019enfant dans ses bras. Muhammad l’a f\u00e9licit\u00e9 : \u00ab Vous avez aid\u00e9 Dieu et son ap\u00f4tre, Umayr ! \u00bb[39]<\/p>\n
Maintenant que nous voyons comment les ingr\u00e9dients fondamentaux de la mentalit\u00e9 du psychopathe sont inh\u00e9rents aux personnages d\u2019Allah et de son messager Mahomet, nous commen\u00e7ons \u00e0 percevoir les fondements du monde du psychopathe jihadiste. Nous passons maintenant \u00e0 l\u2019esquisse des autres caract\u00e9ristiques cl\u00e9s de la psychopathie que l\u2019on retrouve chez le psychopathe jihadiste, et \u00e0 examiner comment elles lui permettent d\u2019assujettir ses victimes : \u00c0 partir des r\u00e9alit\u00e9s expos\u00e9es ci-dessus, il devient clair pourquoi, en l\u2019absence de tout sentiment d\u2019acte r\u00e9pr\u00e9hensible, le psychopathe jihadiste n\u2019a absolument aucune honte et, par cons\u00e9quent, absolument aucune conscience. Il ne ressent aucune culpabilit\u00e9, aucun remords, aucune affection ou compassion. Il n\u2019a en particulier aucun sentiment d\u2019obligation envers les non-musulmans et ne se soucie pas non plus de leur bien-\u00eatre. Comme tout psychopathe, il est inconscient de toute notion de moralit\u00e9, d\u2019empathie ou de responsabilit\u00e9. Il est important de souligner ici que l\u2019Islam est, comme l\u2019a soulign\u00e9 le sp\u00e9cialiste Mark Durie, une v\u00e9ritable attaque contre la conscience humaine elle-m\u00eame, et qu\u2019il att\u00e9nue en fin de compte tout sentiment de honte et de culpabilit\u00e9 chez ses pratiquants face \u00e0 la violence que leurs textes leur ordonnent de faire.[40] C\u2019est pourquoi le psychopathe jihadiste ne s\u2019excuse jamais. En fait, nous n\u2019avons jamais vu de dirigeants ou de groupes musulmans s\u2019excuser aupr\u00e8s de l\u2019Occident pour quoi que ce soit. Par exemple, aucun dirigeant religieux ou politique musulman de premier plan ne s\u2019est jamais excus\u00e9 pour le 11 septembre ou pour toute autre attaque jihadiste.[41]
\nPendant ce temps, tout comme le psychopathe sait pr\u00e9tendre qu\u2019il a une conscience et qu\u2019il est un saint tout en faisant des ravages, le psychopathe jihadiste se lance \u00e9galement dans cette offensive de charme. Cette mascarade transpara\u00eet \u00e0 travers les sbires des psychopathes jihadistes \u2013 les groupes musulmans des \u00ab droits civiques \u00bb en Occident qui rev\u00eatent le masque du type sympa et pr\u00e9tendent qu’ils sont distincts de la terreur islamique violente et du jihad totalitaire de la charia, et que, ce faisant, ils repr\u00e9sentent le le v\u00e9ritable islam. Bien s\u00fbr, derri\u00e8re ce vernis, ces pr\u00e9tendants musulmans soutiennent sans r\u00e9serve ce que fait le psychopathe jihadiste parce qu\u2019il remplit ses obligations islamiques. L\u2019ensemble de la matrice du psychopathe jihadiste appara\u00eet d\u00e9sormais plus clairement : il commet le terrorisme et poursuit des objectifs malveillants \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard des non-musulmans, tandis que ses porte-parole en Occident \u2013 des groupes de fa\u00e7ade des Fr\u00e8res musulmans tels que le Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) , la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 islamique d\u2019Am\u00e9rique du Nord (ISNA) et l\u2019Association des \u00e9tudiants musulmans (MSA) \u2013 jettent de la poudre aux yeux du public non musulman. Ils camouflent la violence de leur religion et ses v\u00e9ritables objectifs sous pr\u00e9texte de vouloir sauvegarder les \u00ab libert\u00e9s civiles \u00bb des musulmans, de combattre la soi-disant islamophobie et de sauver les incroyants eux-m\u00eames de leurs voies non islamiques destructrices et malavis\u00e9es.[42] En d\u2019autres termes, ces trompeurs musulmans se pr\u00e9sentent comme s\u2019ils agissaient par compassion et empathie. et, plus important encore, dans le propre int\u00e9r\u00eat de l\u2019incroyant, de la m\u00eame mani\u00e8re que le psychopathe pr\u00e9tend agir dans l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat de ses victimes \u2013 et de la m\u00eame mani\u00e8re que le Serpent pr\u00e9tendait agir au nom d\u2019\u00c8ve.[43]<\/p>\n
Nous voyons donc comment, lorsque de courageux r\u00e9v\u00e9lateurs de v\u00e9rit\u00e9 osent identifier la cause th\u00e9ologique profonde d\u2019une attaque jihadiste, une certaine section de ce que Nonie Darwish a appel\u00e9 l\u2019Orchestre du terrorisme islamique crie et g\u00e9mit : \u00ab Nous ne sommes pas comme \u00e7a ! \u00bb[44 ] Darwish explique comment cet orchestre a \u00e9labor\u00e9 toute une symphonie astucieuse, chaque section sachant exactement quelles notes jouer et \u00e0 quelle heure. Elle explique comment cela fonctionne : \u2026 lorsque le terrorisme islamique et les d\u00e9capitations irritent le monde et retournent l\u2019opinion publique contre l\u2019islam, cet orchestre commence \u00e0 jouer un ton diff\u00e9rent pour semer la confusion et emp\u00eacher le monde de d\u00e9couvrir leur travail coordonn\u00e9. Tandis qu\u2019un groupe s\u2019attribue fi\u00e8rement le m\u00e9rite du terrorisme, un autre le d\u00e9nonce publiquement. Mais la plupart des groupes, tout en profitant du pouvoir et de l\u2019attention que les terroristes leur ont accord\u00e9, restent l\u00e0 avec un air de victime en disant : \u00ab Je suis aussi une victime parce que vous me condamnez, moi et ma religion pacifique, alors que je n\u2019ai rien fait. Cela n\u2019est pas l\u2019Islam et vous \u00eates un islamophobe. \u00bb[45]<\/p>\n
Il va sans dire, bien s\u00fbr, qu\u2019il existe des individus musulmans mod\u00e9r\u00e9s qui s\u2019opposent au psychopathe jihadiste et qui sont honn\u00eates quant aux sources islamiques du terrorisme. L’auteur Christine Douglass-Williams a interview\u00e9 un groupe distingu\u00e9 de ces musulmans dans son livre, Le d\u00e9fi de la modernisation de l’Islam : les r\u00e9formateurs s’expriment et les obstacles auxquels ils font face.[46] Certains de ces musulmans r\u00e9formateurs, comme le Dr Tawfik Hamid et Shireen Qudosi, sont vraiment courageux, semblent sinc\u00e8res et m\u00e9ritent le soutien de l\u2019Occident. Mais ils sont malheureusement peu nombreux et restent des exceptions \u00e0 la r\u00e8gle.[47]<\/p>\n
Il va sans dire \u00e9galement que l\u2019argument de cet ouvrage n\u2019est \u00e9videmment pas que tous les musulmans sont des psychopathes. Ce n\u2019est clairement pas le cas. Comme nous l\u2019avons vu au chapitre 5, \u00ab Tous les musulmans ne font pas cela \u00bb, il existe de nombreux musulmans bons et pacifiques. Le probl\u00e8me cl\u00e9 ici est que leur tranquillit\u00e9 en dit long sur leur libert\u00e9 et leur dissociation de l\u2019Islam. En d\u2019autres termes, ce livre se concentre sur les musulmans fervents qui suivent les commandements violents de l\u2019Islam avec un fervent d\u00e9vouement.[48] N\u00e9anmoins, peu importe combien de fois cet ouvrage insistera sur ce point, les sbires des psychopathes jihadistes au sein de l\u2019Alliance non Sainte[49] ne manqueront pas de salir ce livre, all\u00e9guant qu\u2019il qualifie d\u2019une mani\u00e8re ou d\u2019une autre tous les musulmans de psychopathes \u2013 alors qu\u2019il ne fait rien de tel. Ce type de calomnie est, bien s\u00fbr, tout \u00e0 fait normal, puisqu\u2019il fait partie de la guerre de propagande des psychopathes jihadistes, qui inclut la tactique consistant \u00e0 lancer des accusations fausses et sans fondement, que nous explorerons au chapitre 12.[50] Il serait \u00e9galement important de souligner ici que, m\u00eame si de nombreux groupes musulmans \u00ab mod\u00e9r\u00e9s \u00bb d\u00e9noncent du bout des l\u00e8vres le terrorisme islamique et les organisations terroristes comme l\u2019EI, peu d\u2019entre eux font r\u00e9ellement quelque chose de concret \u00e0 ce sujet. Comme l\u2019a not\u00e9 l\u2019auteur Robert Spencer, nous n\u2019avons encore vu aucun dirigeant musulman \u00ab mod\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00bb de premier plan aux \u00c9tats-Unis mettre en place, dans ses mosqu\u00e9es et ses institutions, un quelconque programme honn\u00eate, transparent et inspectable qui enseigne le respect de la Constitution am\u00e9ricaine et le rejet de la politique du jihad, de la charia et du supr\u00e9macisme islamique.[51] L\u2019inexistence de tels programmes r\u00e9v\u00e8le quelle est l\u2019attitude r\u00e9elle d\u2019une grande partie de la communaut\u00e9 musulmane. Tous ces ingr\u00e9dients de la mentalit\u00e9 du psychopathe jihadiste montrent clairement que la mascarade du \u00ab Je suis une victime \u00bb est au c\u0153ur de sa guerre contre les incroyants. La manipulation par les supr\u00e9macistes islamiques du terme islamophobie, cens\u00e9 signifier une peur \u00ab irrationnelle \u00bb des musulmans, est un \u00e9l\u00e9ment central de ce stratag\u00e8me. Ils exploitent grossi\u00e8rement ce terme pour se pr\u00e9senter comme des victimes, alors qu\u2019ils commettent leur agression, et cela fonctionne parfaitement. En effet, quiconque observe attentivement les attaques jihadistes constatera que juste apr\u00e8s que les jihadistes ont lanc\u00e9 une frappe, les v\u00e9ritables victimes \u2013 des non-musulmans \u2013 finissent par se mettre en quatre pour s\u2019excuser aupr\u00e8s du monde musulman. En effet, d\u00e8s qu\u2019une voix courageuse souligne une attaque jihadiste et identifie ses inspirations islamiques, la section d\u00e9sign\u00e9e de l\u2019Orchestre de la terreur islamique susmentionn\u00e9e crie : \u00ab Nous ne sommes pas comme \u00e7a ! et \u00ab\u00a0Vous \u00eates islamophobe!\u00a0\u00bb De nombreux non-musulmans se p\u00e9trifient imm\u00e9diatement, reculent et prennent leurs distances avec ceux qui disent la v\u00e9rit\u00e9, s\u2019excusant abondamment aupr\u00e8s de leurs accusateurs musulmans afin qu\u2019ils puissent \u00e9viter que les \u00e9tiquettes de \u00ab racisme \u00bb et de \u00ab discours de haine \u00bb ne leur soient appos\u00e9es. Une relation toxique de cod\u00e9pendance se forme finalement ici, alors que les agresseurs musulmans et leurs victimes qui se rendent, forment un lien toxique. Comme l\u2019explique Greenfield : \u00ab Les musulmans utilisent le statut de victime et la violence pour cr\u00e9er une relation de d\u00e9pendance dans laquelle leurs victimes sont convaincues que la violence qui leur est inflig\u00e9e est caus\u00e9e par ce statut de victime. \u00bb[52]<\/p>\n
Il devient clair pourquoi, imm\u00e9diatement apr\u00e8s chaque attaque jihadiste, le discours des m\u00e9dias \u00e9tablis occidentaux s\u2019empresse d\u2019affirmer que la cause profonde de la terreur islamique \u2013 qui n\u2019est pas d\u00e9sign\u00e9e par son nom \u2013 est la discrimination contre les musulmans. Nous entendons des discussions sans fin sur le fait que les musulmans sont les v\u00e9ritables victimes et que l’islamophobie doit cesser parce qu’elle est \u00e0 l’origine de la violence.[53] Les groupes de fa\u00e7ade des Fr\u00e8res musulmans aident \u00e0 tirer les ficelles pour permettre l\u2019ensemble du processus, remplissant ainsi leur r\u00f4le tel que r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9 dans le document explicatif des Fr\u00e8res musulmans, qui d\u00e9crit la strat\u00e9gie supr\u00e9maciste islamique pour vaincre l\u2019Occident et les \u00c9tats-Unis par nos propres mains.[54] Certains supr\u00e9macistes islamiques parlent ouvertement de cette strat\u00e9gie du \u00ab je suis une victime \u00bb. Lors de la conf\u00e9rence annuelle du Cercle islamique d’Am\u00e9rique du Nord (ICNA) \u00e0 Baltimore, Maryland, en juin 2016, Shaykh Omar Suleiman, membre du Conseil de la charia de l’ICNA, s’est vant\u00e9 dans son discours d’ouverture sur \u00ab Le Coran et l’islamophobie \u00bb : \u00ab Alhamdulilah [Lou\u00e9 soit Dieu] pour l’islamophobie ! \u2026Dieu merci pour l\u2019islamophobie qui nous pousse \u00e0 grandir et \u00e0 d\u00e9velopper une forte identit\u00e9 islamique[.] \u00bb[55] Suleiman a clairement indiqu\u00e9 que le v\u00e9ritable programme de la supr\u00e9matie islamique est de promouvoir l\u2019islamophobie afin de renforcer l\u2019identit\u00e9 et l\u2019id\u00e9ologie islamiques et, par cons\u00e9quent, le pouvoir. Il est important de garder \u00e0 l\u2019esprit ici que Suleiman est l\u2019un des dirigeants de l\u2019ICNA, que la conf\u00e9rence \u00e0 laquelle il a pris la parole \u00e9tait le plus grand rassemblement musulman annuel aux \u00c9tats-Unis et que ses commentaires ont \u00e9t\u00e9 tweet\u00e9s \u00e0 plus de 56 000 abonn\u00e9s.[56] Cet aspect sombre de l\u2019islamophobie est essentiellement le principal stratag\u00e8me de propagande du psychopathe jihadiste visant \u00e0 faire taire ceux qui voudraient dire la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 sur lui.[57] Toute cette mascarade islamophobe a r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 tel point qu\u2019aujourd\u2019hui une campagne \u00e0 l\u2019ONU, men\u00e9e par l\u2019Organisation de la coop\u00e9ration islamique (OCI), progresse dans sa qu\u00eate visant \u00e0 criminaliser toute affirmation de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 sur l\u2019Islam \u00e0 travers la r\u00e9solution 16\/18 de l\u2019ONU. [58] L’auteur Stephen Coughlin a document\u00e9 comment les supr\u00e9macistes islamiques exploitent l’islamophobie dans le contexte de l’OCI. Cette organisation, \u00e9crit-il : a pris le contr\u00f4le de l\u2019utilisation du terme et conserve le contr\u00f4le de son application dans le cadre de campagnes d\u2019information hostiles. Le terme islamophobie est devenu, en fait, une marque g\u00e9r\u00e9e par l\u2019OCI. \u00bb[59] L\u2019islamophobie est donc le principal v\u00e9hicule par lequel le psychopathe jihadiste exploite son statut de victime pour acc\u00e9der au pouvoir, et elle permet son agression envers les incroyants. Comme le note Coughlin, Lorsque nous voyons le mot islamophobie, nous devons imm\u00e9diatement \u00eatre conscients qu’il repr\u00e9sente un programme de campagne de l’OCI qui cherche \u00e0 s’implanter au niveau international ainsi qu’en Am\u00e9rique, avec le soutien des Fr\u00e8res musulmans \u00e0 travers des groupes de fa\u00e7ade qui, comme le dit le m\u00e9morandum explicatif, \u00ab adoptent les causes des musulmans \u00bb, au niveau national et mondial\u2026 et soutenir l\u2019\u00c9tat islamique mondial o\u00f9 qu\u2019il se trouve. \u00bb[60]<\/p>\n
Le Dr Mahathir Mohamad, ancien Premier ministre de Malaisie (connu comme un \u00ab musulman mod\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00bb), a parfaitement cristallis\u00e9 tout ce jeu de victimisation jihadiste lorsque, lors du dixi\u00e8me sommet de l\u2019Organisation de la Conf\u00e9rence islamique en 2003, il a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 : \u00ab Nous sont tous musulmans ; nous sommes tous opprim\u00e9s ; nous sommes tous humili\u00e9s. Par cons\u00e9quent, la solution \u00e0 ce probl\u00e8me, a-t-il d\u00e9clar\u00e9, \u00e9tait que les musulmans acqui\u00e8rent \u00ab des fusils et des roquettes, des bombes et des avions de guerre, des chars et des navires de guerre \u00bb avec lesquels faire la guerre aux non-musulmans.[61] Ali Sina offre un aper\u00e7u approfondi de la dynamique psychologique impliqu\u00e9e ici : Les musulmans doivent se sentir victimes. La doctrine de la victimisation est essentielle \u00e0 la survie de l\u2019Islam. C\u2019est le ciment qui unit la Oumma, le monde musulman tout entier en une seule nation. Sans cela, ils se d\u00e9chireront. Avec cela, ils dirigent leur inimiti\u00e9 contre les autres. En cons\u00e9quence, la paix avec les musulmans est impossible parce que la doctrine de la victimisation est fondamentale dans leur foi.[62]<\/p>\n
Ainsi, apr\u00e8s chaque attaque jihadiste aujourd\u2019hui, nous voyons comment l\u2019\u00e9quipe du Psychopathe jihadiste s\u2019efforce de souligner que les musulmans sont les v\u00e9ritables victimes. Et les dirigeants et les m\u00e9dias occidentaux adoptent d\u00e9sesp\u00e9r\u00e9ment cette tromperie : hame\u00e7on, ligne et plomb. Les exemples sont innombrables : apr\u00e8s l\u2019attentat terroriste d\u2019Orlando du 12 juin 2016, le magazine Time a pris soin de pr\u00e9senter le jihadiste Omar Mateen comme la victime, parce qu\u2019il aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 victime d\u2019intimidation de la part de ses coll\u00e8gues.[63] Le temps n\u2019a pas r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 expliquer pourquoi aucun autre \u00eatre humain en Am\u00e9rique ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 victime d\u2019intimidation n\u2019a perp\u00e9tr\u00e9 la pire attaque terroriste aux \u00c9tats-Unis depuis le 11 septembre. Puis, un mois plus tard, apr\u00e8s l\u2019attentat terroriste de Nice en France \u00e0 la mi-juillet 2016, la BBC a rapport\u00e9 que les musulmans \u00e9taient \u00e9galement les \u00ab vraies victimes \u00bb de cet attentat. En effet, la BBC avait appris que les musulmans locaux affirmaient avoir per\u00e7u une forte islamophobie parmi les non-musulmans apr\u00e8s l’attaque. Un musulman a rapport\u00e9 l\u2019horreur : \u00ab Les gens qui hier m\u2019embrassaient chaleureusement sont maintenant froids envers moi. \u00bb[64] Ainsi, il devient \u00e9vident que le psychopathe jihadiste est une copie conforme du psychopathe traditionnel, avec seulement une composante id\u00e9ologique suppl\u00e9mentaire. Et il devient \u00e9galement tr\u00e8s clair \u00e0 quel point les dirigeants et les guerriers du supr\u00e9macisme islamique sont eux-m\u00eames des psychopathes, tandis que leurs victimes non musulmanes s\u2019abandonnent \u00e0 eux exactement de la m\u00eame mani\u00e8re que les victimes du psychopathe classique s\u2019abandonnent \u00e0 lui. Maintenant que nous avons compris comment le psychopathe jihadiste est l\u2019image miroir du psychopathe classique \u2013 notamment en ce qui concerne la fa\u00e7on dont il tente d\u2019exercer un monopole sur la victimisation \u2013 il est essentiel que nous examinions plus en profondeur cette mascarade de victimisation jihadiste, car elle est \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9picentre de la guerre de notre ennemi contre nous. Nous passons donc maintenant \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tude de plusieurs cas pr\u00e9cis de la mani\u00e8re dont le psychopathe jihadiste a r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 exploiter la carte victime pour mener \u00e0 bien son escroquerie et nous entra\u00eener dans son pi\u00e8ge mortel. These facts are crucial for us to digest in our study of the Jihadist Psychopath because they explain how and why jihadists are like robots that lack any humane or civilized human qualities, including conscience. Jihad is their main mission and, as Darwish reveals, jihad \u201cis the ultimate tool for controlling others.\u201d[17] The whole Islamic objective, therefore, is control. Greenfield also offers a profound reflection on this phenomenon:<\/p>\n Islam is fundamentally about power, not an interior life. It\u2019s a collective relationship rather than a personal one. Power validates Muslims. Since Islam is spiritually empty, the only validation is power and power is a hollow and unsatisfying validation. The truth of Islam is demonstrated through the Muslim oppression of non-Muslims.[18]<\/p>\n As the Jihadist Psychopath pursues his goal of conquering his victims through deceit, violence, and control, he is also constantly shaming and blaming his victims\u2014as a means of establishing his control. The Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s philosophy is clear: his victims are bad, and he is good. This jihadist mindset emanates directly from Allah\u2019s and Muhammad\u2019s teachings that all non-Muslims are sinners, while Muslims are not sinners. In Islam, even if Muslims might sin, it doesn\u2019t matter\u2014as long as they make up for their transgressions by waging jihad. This reality serves as the fertile soil to the jihadists\u2019 monopoly on victimhood, which, in turn, serves as a key gateway for the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s conquering path. We now take a closer look at this dynamic: If faith, a belief, is not watered and irrigated by blood, it does not grow. It does not live. Principles are reinforced by sacrifices, suicide operations and martyrdom for Allah. Faith is propagated by counting up deaths every day, by adding up massacres and charnel-houses. It hardly matters if the person who has been sacrificed is no longer there. He has won.[25]<\/p>\n The reality that emerges in this pathological paradigm is that Muslims are, essentially, taught to bring about the death of the unbelievers, and of themselves, through holy war. And they are instructed to change others, not themselves. So when anything goes \u201cwrong,\u201d it cannot be the fault of a perfect doctrine acted upon by the best of people, it must be the fault of non-Muslims. When jihad is waged on the non-Muslims, it is their fault, because they provoked the war on themselves by being sinners and rejecting Allah.[26] The non-Muslims are always blamed, and Muslims must never take responsibility. Islam is the religion of permanent victimhood. Victimhood justifies revenge. If you are a Muslim, jihad is prescribed on you against those who oppress you. This oppression need not be real. It can be as imaginary as perceiving insult on your belief. Criticizing Islam is consequently perceived as oppression and therefore, Muslims feel compelled and justified to take their revenge.[30] At this juncture, we are able to decipher numerous psychopathic traits that surface in the world of jihad, especially this fundamental one: never having to say you\u2019re sorry. The Jihadist Psychopath never apologizes. Unsurprisingly, Muhammad led by example in this regard as well. Indeed, when Allah\u2019s messenger hurt innocents, he never apologized and always painted his victims as deserving of their punishment. When he committed war crimes, Islamic theology sees him as innocent. When he had six to nine hundred male Jews of the Banu Qurayza tribe beheaded, they had, in the Islamic vision, asked for this fate by refusing to convert to Islam.[33]<\/p>\n And so, an integral element in the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s playbook is crystallized right before our eyes: the I am victim charade. Indeed, while pushing the notion that the victim has brought Islamic aggression upon himself, the Jihadist Psychopath perpetually paints himself as the party that is being wronged. And yes, again, Muhammad led by example here as well, since he played the victim at every stage of his war against unbelievers. In the beginning of his mission, for instance, when Muhammad and his followers were just a small-numbered group in Mecca, and their chances of conquering unbelievers were zero, Allah\u2019s messenger posed as a persecuted and victimized minority whose message was one of peace and tolerance (i.e., Qur\u2019an 109:1\u20136: \u201cYou shall have your religion and I shall have my religion\u201d), while also proclaiming a future vengeance against his non-Muslim persecutors.[34] This set a rule of thumb for all Muslims: when you are in the minority in a country or a population, be deceitful by preaching a message of tolerance and promoting your own victim status as an oppressed minority; when you eventually grow in number and become powerful, take to the sword, as Muhammad and his followers did when they grew in number and gained power.[35] One of the themes of Mohammed\u2019s program was an emphasis on the victimhood of Muslims. To sustain the theological position that conquest is liberation, it becomes necessary to seek grounds to find the infidel enemy guilty and deserving of attack. Also, the more extreme the punishment, the more necessary it becomes to insist upon the enemy\u2019s guilt. Since, by divine decree Muslims\u2019 sufferings were \u201cworse than slaughter,\u201d it became obligatory for Muslims to regard their victimhood as greater than whatever they inflicted upon their enemies. The greater victimhood of Muslims became a doctrinal necessity, a feature of the \u201ccompass of faith\u201d for Muslims.[38]<\/p>\n As a result, even when Muhammad commanded his followers to kill various people, he was always the victim, professing that the people whom he murdered had not only wounded him personally, but also had hurt Allah. The terrible fate of poetess Asma bint Marwan was typical in this regard. When she wrote verses criticizing Muhammad\u2019s murder of another poet, Abu \u2019Afak (who was one hundred years old), Muhammad cried out about the pain she was causing him, asking: \u201cWill no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?\u201d One of Muhammad\u2019s followers, Umayr ibn Adi, immediately went to Marwan\u2019s house the same night, where he murdered her and her baby while she was nursing the infant in her arms. Muhammad commended him: \u201cYou have helped God and his apostle, Umayr!\u201d[39] Meanwhile, just as the psychopath is proficient in pretending that he has a conscience and that he is a saint while wreaking his havoc, so too the Jihadist Psychopath engages in this charm offensive as well. This charade transpires through the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s minions\u2014the Muslim \u201ccivil rights\u201d groups in the West who don the nice guy mask and claim that they are separate from violent Islamic terror and totalitarian sharia jihad, and that, in so doing, they represent the real Islam. Behind this veneer, of course, these Muslim pretenders wholeheartedly support what the Jihadist Psychopath is doing because he is fulfilling Islamic obligations.<\/p>\n The Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s whole matrix now comes into clearer focus: he perpetrates terror and possesses malicious goals vis-\u00e0-vis non-Muslims, while his spokespeople to the West\u2014Muslim Brotherhood front groups such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), and the Muslim Students Association (MSA)\u2014throw dust into the eyes of the non-Muslim public. They camouflage their religion\u2019s violence and its true aims with the pretense of wanting to safeguard Muslims\u2019 \u201ccivil liberties,\u201d combat so-called Islamophobia, and rescue unbelievers themselves from their destructive and misguided un-Islamic ways.[42] In other words, these Muslim deceivers posture as though they are acting out of compassion and empathy, and, most importantly, in the unbeliever\u2019s own interest, the same way that the psychopath pretends he is acting in his victims\u2019 interest\u2014and the same way that the Serpent pretended to act on Eve\u2019s behalf.[43]<\/p>\n We see, therefore, how when brave truth-tellers dare to identify the theological root cause of a jihadist attack, a certain section of what Nonie Darwish has termed the Islamic Terror Orchestra screams and whines: \u201cWe are not like that!\u201d[44] Darwish explains how this orchestra has worked out a whole cunning symphony, with each section knowing exactly what notes to play, and at what time. She outlines how it works: It goes without saying, of course, that there are moderate Muslim individuals who do oppose the Jihadist Psychopath and are honest about Islamic sources of terror. Author Christine Douglass-Williams has interviewed a distinguished group of these Muslim individuals in her book, The Challenge of Modernizing Islam: Reformers Speak Out and the Obstacles They Face.[46] Some of these reform-minded Muslims, such as Dr. Tawfik Hamid and Shireen Qudosi, are truly brave, do appear sincere, and deserve the West\u2019s support. But they are, unfortunately, small in number and remain exceptions to the rule.[47] It would also be important to point out here that while many \u201cmoderate\u201d Muslim groups pay lip service to denouncing Islamic terror and terrorist organizations like ISIS, few of them ever really actually do anything concrete about it. As author Robert Spencer has noted, we have yet to see any prominent \u201cmoderate\u201d Muslim leaders in the United States set up, in their mosques and institutions, any honest, transparent, and inspectable programs that teach adherence to the U.S. Constitution and a rejection of jihad, sharia, and Islamic supremacism.[51] The nonexistence of such programs reveals what attitude is really at hand in a large section of the Muslim community.<\/p>\n All of these ingredients of the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s mindset make it clear that the I am victim charade is at the core of his war on unbelievers. Islamic supremacists\u2019 manipulation of the term Islamophobia, which supposedly means an \u201cirrational\u201d fear of Muslims, is a central feature of this ploy. They crudely exploit this term to portray themselves as victims, while they perpetrate their aggression, and it works perfectly. Indeed, anyone who carefully observes jihadist attacks will witness that right after jihadists launch a strike, the actual victims\u2014non-Muslims\u2014end up bending over backwards to apologize to the Muslim world. This is because once any brave voice points to a jihadist attack and identifies its Islamic inspirations, the designated section of the aforementioned Islamic Terror Orchestra screams, \u201cWe are not like that!\u201d and \u201cYou are an Islamophobe!\u201d Many non-Muslims immediately get petrified, recoil, and distance themselves from the truth-tellers, profusely apologizing to their Muslim accusers so that they can prevent the labels of \u201cracism\u201d and \u201chate speech\u201d from being affixed to them. A toxic relationship of codependence ultimately forms here, as Muslim abusers and their surrendering victims form a toxic bond. As Greenfield explains: \u201cMuslims use victimhood and violence to create a dependent relationship in which their victims are convinced that the violence inflicted on them is caused by that victimhood.\u201d[52] Some Islamic supremacists are completely open about this I am victim strategy. At the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) annual conference in Baltimore, Maryland, in June 2016, Shaykh Omar Suleiman, a member of ICNA\u2019s Shariah Council, boasted in his keynote session speech \u201cQuran and Islamophobia\u201d: \u201cAlhamdulilah [Praise be to God] for Islamophobia! \u2026Thank God for Islamophobia that causes us to grow and develop a strong Islamic identity[.]\u201d[55] Suleiman made it clear that the real Islamic supremacist agenda is to push Islamophobia in order to empower Islamic identity, ideology, and, therefore, power. It is important to keep in mind here that Suleiman is one of ICNA\u2019s leaders, that the conference at which he spoke was the largest annual Muslim gathering in the U.S., and that his comments were tweeted out to over 56,000 followers.[56]<\/p>\n This dark feature of Islamophobia is, essentially, the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s central propaganda ploy for silencing those who would tell the truth about him.[57] The whole Islamophobia charade has succeeded to such an extent that now a campaign in the UN, led by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), is making headway in its quest to criminalize any truth-telling about Islam through UN Resolution 16\/18.[58] Author Stephen Coughlin has documented how Islamic supremacists exploit Islamophobia in the context of the OIC. That organization, he writes: Muslims must feel victimized. The doctrine of victimhood is essential to the survival of Islam. It is the glue that binds the ummah, the entire Muslim world into one nation. Without it they will tear each other apart. With it they direct their enmity at others. As a result, peace with Muslims is impossible because the doctrine of victimhood is fundamental to their faith.[62]<\/p>\n Thus, after every jihadist attack today, we see how the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s team takes pains to stress that Muslims are the true victims. And Western leaders and media desperately embrace this deceit\u2014hook, line, and sinker. The examples are endless: after the Orlando terror attack of June 12, 2016, Time magazine made sure to portray the jihadist perpetrator, Omar Mateen, as the victim, because he allegedly had been bullied by his coworkers.[63] Time failed to explain why no other human being in America who had been bullied didn\u2019t go on to perpetrate the worst terrorist attack in America since 9\/11. Then, a month later, after the Nice terror attack in France in mid-July 2016, the BBC reported that Muslims were the \u201creal victims\u201d of that attack as well. This was because the BBC had learned that local Muslims were claiming to have perceived a great deal of Islamophobia among non-Muslims after the attack. One Muslim reported the horror: \u201cPeople who yesterday would embrace me warmly are now cold towards me.\u201d[64]<\/p>\n And so, it becomes transparently evident that the Jihadist Psychopath is a carbon copy of the traditional psychopath\u2014only with an added ideological component. And it likewise becomes crystal clear how Islamic supremacism\u2019s leaders and warriors are psychopaths themselves, while their non-Muslim victims surrender to them in exactly the same manner as the victims of the textbook psychopath surrender to him. Notes: Psychopathe Jihadiste Comme tout psychopathe, le psychopathe jihadiste cherche \u00e0 d\u00e9truire et \u00e0 conqu\u00e9rir. Alors qu\u2019il suit les mandats de sa religion, il est spirituellement vide \u00e0 l\u2019int\u00e9rieur. Il doit donc voler la force vitale des non-musulmans dont il est victime, afin de pouvoir subvenir temporairement \u00e0 ses besoins. Sa strat\u00e9gie est impitoyable et rus\u00e9e.… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":68956,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68955","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\n
\n—
\nJihadist Psychopath<\/strong>
\nLike any psychopath, the Jihadist Psychopath seeks to destroy and conquer. While he is following his religion\u2019s mandates, he is spiritually empty inside. He therefore needs to steal the life force of the non-Muslims he victimizes\u2014so he can temporarily sustain himself. His strategy is ruthless and cunning. He charms, deceives, and manipulates\u2014and when he gauges that the moment is right, he entraps his non-Muslim victims and devours them.
\nTo demonstrate how the Jihadist Psychopath is today achieving success in his malicious quest, we will now enter and unveil his morbid world. We encourage our readers to keep the previous chapter handy and to have its key themes in mind, for as we outline the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s main characteristics and his strategy for conquest, it will become clear, element by element, how his agenda is a mirror image of the traditional psychopath\u2019s world\u2014only with a Jihadist twist.
\nIn his quest to subjugate non-Muslims, the Jihadist Psychopath has his obvious weapon of violent jihad, but he also has an equally\u2014if not more\u2014powerful weapon in his arsenal: the ploy of deception. It is vital for us to launch our story by examining this tactic, for it serves as the essential foundation for the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s warfare.
\nOur study of the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s trickery begins with the fact that Islam is, at its very core, a religion\/ideology rooted in deception. The God of Islam, who goes by the name of Allah, proudly refers to himself as the greatest deceiver several times in the Qur\u2019an.[1] If Allah is the father of lies, it becomes understandable why Islam teaches that lying is an obligation for Muslims if it serves the benefit of Islam. Islamic authorities have even created actual religious doctrines that mandate and justify lying. One of these doctrines is known as taqiyya, a principle that allows Muslims to lie to non-Muslims for the sake of subjugating them and empowering Islam.[2] Muslims are also encouraged to break their oaths if doing so will advance the cause of Islamic supremacism.[3] The prophet of Islam, Muhammad, who is considered the ideal model to be emulated by all Muslims,[4] led by perfect example in this department, breaking numerous oaths and treaties, including those he had made with the Jewish tribes known as the Banu Qaynuqa and the Quraysh. Muhammad violated the treaty of Hudaybiyya with the Quraysh, for instance, by refusing to return a woman of the tribe, Umm-Kulthum, back to Mecca.
\nAllah and Muhammad both laid out examples of deception for their followers to emulate. And while they commanded Muslims to deceive non-Muslims, they also deceived fellow Muslims themselves. Indeed, the Islamic paradise that is promised to Muslims if they die while waging holy war against non-Muslims is in itself a deceptive scheme manufactured by Muhammad, in Allah\u2019s name, for the sake of luring Muslims into jihad.[5] Islam enforces jihad as an obligatory duty for all Muslims and, not withstanding Islamic supremacists\u2019 taqiyya about what jihad is really about,[6] it is meant to be violent. In Islamic texts, jihad is clearly defined as \u201cwar with non-Muslims to establish the religion.\u201d[7] As a result, Muslims are tricked and forced into fighting jihad. And not only do they have to kill and die for Allah, but it is highly problematic for them to try to escape this fate, since Muhammad commanded the killing of any Muslim who leaves the religion.[8]
\nWhat we have here is a structure in which Muslims are instructed to deceive non-Muslims while they themselves are deceived. To compound the pathology of this paradigm, Muslims are also commanded to take control of non-Muslims and to shame them, while Allah controls and shames Muslims themselves in the process.[9] Indeed, Allah is constantly threatening and humiliating not only his enemies, but also his followers.[10] Islamic law, after all, has extremely rigid religious rules, which include the mandate of praying and fasting, by which everyone must abide. Muslims are accountable to one another in this context, and a perpetual atmosphere of dread and terror hovers around the obligatory following of these rules. In societies that are governed by sharia, for example, a Muslim can easily be sentenced to death if he\/she is caught not fasting properly during Ramadan.[11] What we basically have in this paradigm, therefore, as writer Daniel Greenfield points out, \u201cis a hierarchy of deception and oppression with the Muslims being, first and foremost, slaves of Allah.\u201d[12] As a result, Muslims are under perpetual pressure to control one another, while their main duty is to wage holy war. The end result is that sharia is imposed on everyone (who isn\u2019t murdered), and no individuality or freedom remains.[13] A small loophole is sometimes left for those non-Muslims who refuse to convert but agree to live as second-class \u201cdhimmis,\u201d paying taxes and abiding by very strict rules.[14]
\nThus, we begin to gauge how humans\u2019 highest purpose in Islam is to sacrifice their lives for Allah\u2014whereas conversely, in Christianity, God sacrifices His only son, Jesus, for humans.[15] The scholarship of author Nonie Darwish on this stark contrast between Islam\u2019s Allah and the God of the Bible powerfully illuminates the physical and mental slavery in which Islam\u2019s followers find themselves trapped. As Darwish documents, the Islamic faith confers absolutely no intrinsic self-worth upon Muslims. That is, Muslims have no \u201crelationship\u201d with Allah, nor any kind of two-way conversation with him. They are not welcome to approach Allah to discuss or confess what is in their hearts and minds. They are not entitled to any freedom of conscience or to use their own powers of reason. On this one-way street, a mean, angry, and sadistic Allah simply tells Muslims what to do and what not to do. Unquestioning obedience to Allah, therefore, under penalty of death and hellfire, is the core message of Islam. In the Bible, by contrast, God is a loving father with whom an individual can have a relationship and personal conversation\u2014and through whom he can find salvation.[16]<\/p>\n
\nIn Islam, non-Muslims are seen as evil and perverted transgressors. Muhammad made this message very clear by waging war on unbelievers and relentlessly condemning Christians and Jews for rejecting Allah.[19] As Darwish notes:
\nIslam is the only religion that dedicates the majority of its scriptures not to its own followers but to condemning whole groups of people outside the religion as cursed, doomed, and unforgiven sinners.[20]
\nTo be sure, Islam defines unbelievers as the very worst of people, the guilty. Muhammad, meanwhile, as noted above, is seen as the role model of exemplary behavior, and his followers are inherently innocent. Islam sees itself as perfect, and it regards Muslims as \u201cthe best of people\u201d who are never wrong in any way when persecuting non-Muslims.[21] Moreover, unlike for Jews and Christians in the Bible, to whom confession brings forgiveness, grace, and redemption, confessing sins in Islam is not a blessing. This is because, again, Muslims are not seen as sinners in Islamic theology, and if they do sin, they are not to confess their sins, but to conceal them.[22] For those Muslims who are guilty of wrongdoing, there is only one way to be forgiven, and that is to wage war on non-Muslims in jihad.[23] And so, since most Muslims are aware, in their own private conscience, that they are, in various ways, sinners, they know what they have to do about it. Consequently, jihad is really, in the end, all about purifying oneself not only with the blood of others, but also with one\u2019s own blood.[24] Algerian militant Ali Benhadj crystallized this central tenet of Islam, which maintains that death and blood purify the earth:<\/p>\n
\nIslamic theology provides yet another reason for Muslims to never be held accountable for anything in relation to the non-Muslim: unbelievers\u2019 disbelief is regarded as being worse than murder. That is, non-Muslims\u2019 rebellion against Allah is considered to be a greater transgression than even an act of murder committed against them.[27] The very existence of non-Muslims is regarded by Islam as offensive, and as a provocation to justifiable violence.[28] Thus, Islam is, by its very nature, a victim. As ex-Muslim writer Abu Kasem has documented, Islamic theology inspires the notion that Islam itself is offended and persecuted by any un-Islamic activities carried out by unbelievers anywhere at any time. He provides numerous examples, from a female unbeliever venturing outdoors without a hijab, to unbelievers drinking alcohol or going to a stage theatre. Anyone doing anything, anywhere, that is against what Allah wants, represents an affront to Islam. Consequently, Islam views itself as the only religion to which every person on earth must submit, and the failure to submit is considered an act of defiance against Islam.[29] And while the Jihadist Psychopath convinces us that he is the real victim, he must also convince himself. As Iranian ex-Muslim Ali Sina explains:<\/p>\n
\nThroughout the entire time that jihadists are oppressing unbelievers, therefore, they believe that they are the ones who are being oppressed. And the jihadists engaged in this behavior cannot be sinning, since, again, there is no sin in Islam and no need for Muslims to ever be contrite for their actions. Thus, we find the Qur\u2019an giving permission to the oppressed to fight against their oppressors,[31] and the Islamic justification for jihad to eliminate disbelief.[32]<\/p>\n
\nOnce Muhammad had grown in strength and was capable of subjugating unbelievers, jihad entered a violent stage, and so Muhammad waged ruthless holy war, which included his ordering of political assassinations. But even when Muhammad engaged in this terror, he still positioned himself as the victim. After all, the Jewish tribes against which he perpetrated jihad still refused to convert to Islam, and such a refusal was seen by Muhammad as an act of oppression against him and his followers\u2014and as violence against Allah.[36] This is why Islamic commentators on Muhammed\u2019s brutality against the Jews always stress the victimhood of the Muslims and the treachery of the Jews.[37] Author Mark Durie notes how Muhammad played the victim card:<\/p>\n
\nNow that we see how the fundamental ingredients of the psychopath\u2019s mindset are inherent in the personas of both Allah and his messenger Muhammad, we begin to behold the foundations of the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s world. We now move on to outline the other key characteristics of psychopathy that are found in the Jihadist Psychopath, and to examine how they enable him to subjugate his victims:
\nFrom the realities illuminated above, it becomes clear why, with the lack of any sense of wrongdoing, the Jihadist Psychopath possesses absolutely no shame and, in turn, absolutely no conscience. He feels no guilt, remorse, affection, or compassion. He especially does not have any sense of obligation to non-Muslims, nor is he concerned about their welfare. He is, like every psychopath, oblivious to any notion of morality, empathy, or responsibility. It is important to stress here that Islam is, as scholar Mark Durie has pointed out, an actual attack on the human conscience itself, and that it ultimately blunts any feelings of shame and guilt in its practitioners regarding the violence that their texts command them to carry out.[40] This is why the Jihadist Psychopath never apologizes. In fact, we have never seen any Muslim leaders or groups apologizing to the West for anything. Not one prominent Muslim religious or political leader, for example, has ever apologized for 9\/11 or for any other jihadist attack.[41]<\/p>\n
\n\u2026when Islamic terrorism and beheadings anger the world and turn public opinion against Islam, that orchestra starts playing a different tune to confuse and prevent the world from uncovering their coordinated handy work. While one group proudly takes credit for the terror, another publicly denounces it. But most groups, while enjoying the power and attention the terrorists have bestowed on them, stand by with a look of victimhood saying: \u201cI am a victim too because you condemn me and my peaceful religion when I did not do anything. That is not Islam and you are an Islamophobe.\u201d[45]<\/p>\n
\nIt also goes without saying that the argument of this work is, obviously, not that all Muslims are psychopaths. They are clearly not. As we discussed in Chapter 5, \u201cNot All Muslims Do That,\u201d there are many good and peaceful Muslims. The key issue here is that their peacefulness says something about their freedom and dissociation from Islam. In other words, this book\u2019s focus is on the devout Muslims who follow Islam\u2019s violent commands with fervent dedication.[48] Nonetheless, no matter how many times this work will emphasize this point, the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s minions within the Unholy Alliance[49] will definitely smear this book, alleging that it somehow labels all Muslims as psychopaths\u2014when it is doing no such thing. This type of slander is, of course, only to be expected, since it is part of the Jihadist Psychopath\u2019s propaganda war, which includes the tactic of making false and ungrounded accusations, which we will explore in Chapter 12.[50]<\/p>\n
\nIt becomes clear why, immediately after every jihadist attack, the narrative within the West\u2019s establishment media is quick to claim that the root cause of Islamic terror\u2014which is not called by its name\u2014is discrimination against Muslims. We hear endless discussions about how Muslims are the real victims, and how Islamophobia has to end because it is causing the violence.[53] Muslim Brotherhood front groups help pull the strings to enable the whole process, thereby fulfilling their role as revealed in the Muslim Brotherhood document Explanatory Memorandum, which outlines the Islamic supremacist strategy to defeat the West and the U.S. by our own hands.[54]<\/p>\n
\nhas taken control of the term\u2019s usage and retains control of its application for use in hostile information campaigns. The term Islamophobia has become, in effect, a brand that is managed by the OIC.\u201d[59]
\nIslamophobia, therefore, is the principal vehicle through which the Jihadist Psychopath exploits his victim status to gain power, and it enables his aggression toward unbelievers. As Coughlin notes,
\nWhen we see the word Islamophobia we should instantly be aware that it represents an OIC campaign package that seeks its implantation internationally as well as in America, with support from the Brotherhood through front groups that, as the Explanatory Memorandum says, \u201cadopt Muslims\u2019 causes domestically and globally\u2026and support the global Islamic State wherever it is.\u201d[60]
\nDr. Mahathir Mohamad, the ex-prime minister of Malaysia (known as a \u201cmoderate Muslim\u201d), crystallized this whole jihadist victimhood game perfectly when, in the tenth summit of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference in 2003, he stated: \u201cWe are all Muslims; we are all oppressed; we are all being humiliated.\u201d Therefore, the solution to this problem, he stated, was for Muslims to acquire \u201cguns and rockets, bombs and warplanes, tanks and warships\u201d with which to wage war on non-Muslims.[61] Ali Sina offers keen insight into the psychological dynamic involved here:<\/p>\n
\nNow that we have deciphered how the Jihadist Psychopath is the mirror image of the textbook psychopath\u2014especially with regard to how he attempts to wield a monopoly on victimhood\u2014it is essential that we examine further this jihadist victimhood charade, since it is at the epicenter of our enemy\u2019s war against us. We therefore now move forward to study several specific cases of how the Jihadist Psychopath has successfully exploited the victim card to carry out his con game and lead us into his deadly trap.<\/p>\n
\n[1] Suras 3:54, 7:99, and 8:30. See Nonie Darwish, Wholly Different: Why I Chose Biblical Values Over Islamic Values (Washington, DC: Regnery, 2017), pp. 48\u201349.
\n[2] Raymond Ibrahim, \u201cTaqiyya about Taqiyya,\u201d RaymondIbrahim.com, April 12, 2014. http:\/\/raymondibrahim.com\/2014\/04\/12\/taqiyya-about-taqiyya\/.
\n[3] Darwish, pp. 47\u201352.
\n[4] Robert Spencer, The Truth About Muhammad (Washington, DC: Regnery, 2006), pp. 8\u201310.
\n[5] Raymond Ibrahim, \u201cIslam\u2019s Celestial Concubines\u2014Muslim Men Die for Them, Muslim Women Envy Them,\u201d JihadWatch.org, November 25, 2016. https:\/\/www.jihadwatch.org\/2016\/11\/raymond-ibrahim-islams-celestial-concubines-muslim-men-die-for-them-muslim-women-envy-them; For the Qur\u2019an\u2019s descriptions of paradise see Robert Spencer, The Truth About Muhammad, pp. 57\u201358.
\n[6] A typical example of Muslims\u2019 taqiyya about the meaning of jihad is Linda Sarsour\u2019s calling for jihad against Trump and then, after being called out on it, explaining that she was really talking about fighting for racial and economic justice\u2014when it was completely clear what she meant. A masterpiece takedown of Sarsour\u2019s taqiyya on this matter is Robert Spencer, \u201cYes, Linda Sarsour Did Incite Violence Against President Trump,\u201d PJMedia.com, July 10, 2017. https:\/\/pjmedia.com\/homeland-security\/2017\/07\/10\/yes-linda-sarsour-did-incite-violence-against-president-trump\/.
\n[7] A teaching outlined in the Reliance of the Traveler, a classical manual of sharia law, quoted in Darwish, p. 50.
\n[8] For why apostates have to be killed in Islam, see Spencer, The Truth About Muhammad, pp. 147\u2013148.
\n[9] Darwish, pp. 136\u2013141.
\n[10] Darwish, p. 32. See also Bosch Fawstin\u2019s article on how Muslims are the victims of Islam: \u201cThe Muslim World Is a World Where the Bad Guy Won,\u201d Frontpagemag.com, May 2, 2013. http:\/\/www.frontpagemag.com\/fpm\/188241\/muslim-world-world-where-bad-guy-won-bosch-fawstin.
\n[11] See Pamela Geller, \u201cKuwait: Muslim Kills His Own Brother for Not Fasting During Ramadan,\u201d PamelaGeller.com, June 30, 2016. http:\/\/pamelageller.com\/2016\/06\/kuwait-muslim-kills-his-own-brother-for-not-fasting-during-ramadan.html\/.
\n[12] Interview with Daniel Greenfield, September 18, 2018.
\n[13] Darwish, p. 137.
\n[14] The rigid rules that Christians under the Islamic State have to abide if they take dhimmi status (\u201cprotected\u201d non-Muslim people living in inferior status) is a clear example of this one cruel loophole non-Muslims have to survive under Islam, and it is rooted in Islamic teachings. See Robert Spencer, \u201c11 Dhimma rules that Christians must obey in the Islamic State,\u201d JihadWatch.org, September 7, 2015. https:\/\/www.jihadwatch.org\/2015\/09\/11-dhimma-rules-that-christians-must-obey-in-the-islamic-state.
\n[15] Darwish, pp. 42\u201343.
\n[16] Darwish outlines these differences in the God of the Bible as a loving and forgiving God in whom there is grace, and Islam\u2019s Allah, who is a sadistic controller who wants submission. See especially her chapter, \u201cHealing, Salvation, and the Holy Spirit,\u201d in Wholly Different, pp. 29\u201346, and for the phenomenon of submission to Allah, see pp. 62\u201363.
\n[17] Darwish, p. 137.
\n[18] Interview with Daniel Greenfield, September 18, 2018.
\n[19] Ibid., pp. 14\u201315. See also: Robert Spencer, \u201cDoes the Qur\u2019an Teach Hate?\u201d Frontpagemag.com, September 17, 2013. http:\/\/www.frontpagemag.com\/fpm\/204505\/does-quran-teach-hate-robert-spencer.
\n[20] Darwish, pp. 14\u201315.
\n[21] Darwish, p. 16\u201318; Spencer, \u201cDoes the Qur\u2019an Teach Hate?\u201d See Qur\u2019an 3:110.
\n[22] Darwish, p. 22.
\n[23] Ibid., pp. 26\u201327.
\n[24] See Chapter 9, \u201cYearnings for Death and Suicide,\u201d pp. 101\u2013115 and Chapter 12, \u201cKilling and Dying for Purity,\u201d pp. 145\u2013151 in Jamie Glazov, United in Hate: The Left\u2019s Romance with Tyranny and Terror (Los Angeles, CA: WND Books, 2009).
\n[25] Paul Berman, Terror and Liberalism (New York: W. W. Norton, 2003), p. 120.
\n[26] Darwish, p. 19.
\n[27] Surah 2:191\u2013193.
\n[28] Darwish, p. 85.
\n[29] For Kasem\u2019s long list of the many ways Islam views itself as a victim when an unbeliever somewhere on the planet does not abide by Islamic laws, see: Abul Kasem, \u201cWhen Is Islam Oppressed?\u201d Islam-Watch.org, November 20, 2005. http:\/\/www.islam-watch.org\/AbulKasem\/IslamOppressed.htm.
\n[30] Author\u2019s interview with Ali Sina, February 28, 2016.
\n[31] Surah 22:39\u201340.
\n[32] Qur\u2019an 2:193, 8:39. See Mark Durie, Liberty to the Captives: Freedom from Islam and Dhimmitude Through the Cross, section 4.
\n[33] Robert Spencer, The Truth About Muhammad, pp. 128\u2013133.
\n[34] David Wood, \u201cThree Stages of Jihad,\u201d AnsweringMuslims.com, http:\/\/www.answeringmuslims.com\/p\/jihad.html.
\n[35] Ibid.
\n[36] For a discussion on the nature and roots of Muhammad\u2019s war against Jewish tribes, see Robert Spencer, Chapter 7, \u201cWar Is Deceit, pp. 103\u2013123, in The Truth About Muhammad.
\n[37] Mark Durie, The Third Choice: Islam, Dhimmitude, and Freedom (Australia: Deror Books, 2010), p. 113.
\n[38] Ibid.
\n[39] This story is told by the first biographer of Muhammad, Ibn Ishaq. Retold and quoted by Spencer, The Truth About Muhammad, pp. 162\u2013163. See also Robert Spencer, \u201cMalala: Muhammad Never Advised His Followers to \u2018Go Around Killing People\u2026We Are Not Representing the True Islam,\u2019\u201d JihadWatch.org, April 16, 2017. https:\/\/www.jihadwatch.org\/2017\/04\/malala-muhammad-never-advised-his-followers-to-go-around-killing-people-we-are-not-representing-the-true-islam.
\n[40] Mark Durie discusses Islam\u2019s attack on the human conscience on \u201cThe Glazov Gang: Mark Durie on \u2018Our Fear of Islam,\u2019\u201d Glazov Gang YouTube Channel, June 13, 2014. https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=xn0km52dCIg.
\n[41] Darwish, p. 23.
\n[42] To learn about the agendas of CAIR, ISNA, and the MSA, read the profiles of each group at DiscovertheNetworks.org: CAIR: http:\/\/www.discoverthenetworks.org\/Articles\/cairprofilestand.html; ISNA: http:\/\/www.discoverthenetworks.org\/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6178; MSA: http:\/\/www.discoverthenetworks.org\/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6175.
\n[43] See Chapter 2, \u201cThe Utopian Virus.\u201d
\n[44] Nonie Darwish, \u201cThe Islamic Terror Orchestra,\u201d Frontpagemag.com, August 25, 2014. http:\/\/www.frontpagemag.com\/fpm\/239437\/islamic-terror-orchestra-nonie-darwish.
\n[45] Ibid.
\n[46] Christine Douglass-Williams, The Challenge of Modernizing Islam: Reformers Speak Out and the Obstacles They Face (New York: Encounter Books, 2017).
\n[47] Stephen M. Kirby, \u201cMuslim Reform Group Reached Out to 3,000 US Mosques, Got Only 40 Responses,\u201d JihadWatch.org, February 24, 2017. https:\/\/www.jihadwatch.org\/2017\/02\/muslim-reform-group-reached-out-to-3000-us-mosques-got-only-40-responses.
\n[48] See Chapter 5, \u201cNot All Muslims Do That!\u201d
\n[49] Unholy Alliance is the term this work uses to refer to the alliance between the Left and Islamic supremacism, a phenomenon documented by David Horowitz in his work, Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left (Washington, DC: Regnery, 2004). For more discussion and analysis on the Left\u2019s romance with Islamic supremacism, and how this romance is an extension of the Left\u2019s alliance with communism during the Cold War, see Jamie Glazov, United in Hate: The Left\u2019s Romance with Tyranny and Terror (Los Angeles: WND, 2009).
\n[50] See Chapter 12, pp. 133-134, 139-140.
\n[51] Robert Spencer, \u201cObama to Visit Muslim Brotherhood-Aligned Mosque,\u201d PJMedia.com, February 3, 2016. https:\/\/pjmedia.com\/homeland-security\/2016\/02\/03\/obama-to-visit-muslim-brotherhood-aligned-mosque\/.
\n[52] Interview with Daniel Greenfield, September 18, 2018. We expand on this codependent relationship between the Jihadist Psychopath and his willing surrendering victims in Chapter 14, \u201cIdentifying with the Abuser.\u201d
\n[53] This dynamic is explained in Chapter 5: \u201cNot All Muslims Do That!\u201d
\n[54] The Explanatory Memorandum is an internal document of the Muslim Brotherhood captured by the FBI in 2005 that outlines the Brotherhood\u2019s design to destroy America by America\u2019s own hands as part of its overall goal of \u201celiminating and destroying Western civilization from within, and sabotaging its miserable house.\u201d The memorandum named the front groups doing this dirty work, and revealed what they are doing: destroying the house from within with many different tactics, including Jihad Denial propaganda, interfaith tricks, etc. For more information see the Discover the Network\u2019s profile on \u201cThe Muslim Brotherhood\u2019s General Strategic Goal\u2019 for North America.\u201d http:\/\/www.discoverthenetworks.org\/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1235.
\n[55] David M. Swindle, \u201cOops: Islamist Leader Boasts \u2018Thank God for Islamophobia\u2019 at Conference,\u201d Islamist-Watch.org, June 6, 2016. http:\/\/www.islamist-watch.org\/blog\/2016\/06\/oops-islamist-leader-boasts-thank-god-for#continued.
\n[56] Ibid.
\n[57] Robert Spencer, \u201cDid the Muslim Brotherhood invent the term \u2018Islamophobia\u2019?,\u201d JihadWatch.org, August 27, 2012. http:\/\/www.jihadwatch.org\/2012\/08\/did-the-muslim-brotherhood-invent-the-term-islamophobia.
\n[58] See Chapter 1, \u201cThe Case,\u201d pp. 11-12.
\n[59] Stephen Coughlin, Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad (Washington DC: Center for Security Policy Press, 2015), pp. 269.
\n[60] Coughlin, p. 269.
\n[61] Ali Sina, \u201cThe Search of the Moderate Muslim,\u201d FaithFreedom.org. http:\/\/www.faithfreedom.org\/oped\/sina31107.htm.
\n[62]Author\u2019s interview with Ali Sina, February 28, 2016.
\n[63] Trey Sanchez, \u201cTIME Makes Omar Mateen the Victim,\u201d TruthRevolt.org, July 18, 2016. http:\/\/www.truthrevolt.org\/news\/time-makes-omar-mateen-victim.
\n[64] James Delingpole, \u201cMuslims Were the Real Victims of the Nice Terror Attack, the BBC Explains,\u201d Breitbart.com, July 18, 2016. http:\/\/www.breitbart.com\/london\/2016\/07\/18\/muslims-were-the-real-victims-of-the-nice-terror-attack-the-bbc-explains\/.
\n
\nJamie Glazov
\nJamie Glazov holds a Ph.D. in History, with a specialty in Russian, U.S. and Canadian foreign policy. He is the editor of Frontpage Magazine, the author of the critically-acclaimed and best-selling books, United in Hate and Jihadist Psychopath, and the host of the web-tv show, The Glazov Gang. His newest book is Barack Obama’s True Legacy: How He Transformed America. Follow him on Twitter and GETTR, and email him at: jamieglazov11@gmail.com.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"